A Journal for Life, Page 2 Portions of this resource material were compiled in fall, 1997, during Sen. Slade Gorton's major attack on the sovereignty of American Indian tribes, while other sections are new. As you read this material and visit the reference sources, you might find yourself asking: is there a common thread of philosophy that touches everything that he does? "Senator Slade Gorton (R-Washington) has an almost perfect record of supporting the timber industry. Is it at all surprising, then, that he received $112,000 in campaign contributions from timber-harvesting political action committees (PACs) between 1987 and 1995? In fact, the timber industry has invested more than five times as much political cash in trying to influence reauthorization of the Endangered Species Act as has the entire environmental movement."The scope of Gorton's attack on wildlife and the environment may shock you. Here are some short clips from the SECTION-BY-SECTION SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF S. 768, HE GORTON-JOHNSTON ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REFORM ACT OF 1995 . Mr. Williams' and Mr. Irvin's astute analysis provide a very clear road map to discovering Sen. Gorton's philosophy about wildlife and natural resources. SECTION-BY-SECTION SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF S. 768, THE GORTON-JOHNSTON ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REFORM ACT OF 1995 Prepared by Christopher E. Williams World Wildlife Fund (202) 778-9792 Wm. Robert Irvin Center for Marine Conservation (202) 857-5551 SUMMARY: Changes the standard for emergency listings from "significant risk to the well-being" of the species to "imminent threat to the existence of" the species, defined as "a significant likelihood that the species will be placed on an irreversible course to extinction during the 2-year period from the date of the listing determination unless the species is accorded fully the protections available under this Act during the period." Prohibits the Secretary from delegating authority to make emergency listing determinations. ANALYSIS: Increases the risk of species extinction by imposing extremely stringent standard for emergency listings, without any basis for concluding that the emergency listing authority has been abused. Assumes that timing of extinction can be determined within two years' precision. TITLE II. CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES AND CONSERVATION PLANS SEC. 201. CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES CONSERVATION PLANS AND CRITICAL HABITAT SEC. 201. CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES CONSERVATION PLANS AND CRITICAL HABITAT ANALYSIS: Abandons the ESA's central goal of recovering threatened and endangered species. Interior Secretary is authorized, without public review and comment, to provide less protection to listed species than is required by current law, including abandoning all efforts to protect habitat. For distinct populations protected as listed species, such as gray wolves and grizzly bears, Secretary would be prohibited from providing greater protection unless a determination is made that it is in the national interest to do so. Assessment and planning teams required to make complex biological, economic, and social analyses in constricted period. Assessment of impact on use of property is not limited to real property. Critical Habitat: ANALYSIS : Eliminates promotion of species recovery as a reason for designating critical habitat by limiting designations to presently occupied habitat necessary to the persistence of a species for the next 50 years. Effect of Conservation Plans and Objectives on Public and Private Activities: ANALYSIS: Eliminates any meaningful consultation requirement under the ESA by making consultation discretionary with federal agencies. Creates an incentive for any person taking a listed species to claim that their action was consistent with a conservation plan or objective and, therefore, not a taking. SEC. 306. PROGRAMMATIC CONSULTATIONS ANALYSIS: Allows potentially harmful activities under federal land management plans to occur before it has been determined that the plans themselves will not jeopardize listed species. SEC. 403. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE TAKE PROHIBITION ANALYSIS: Creates broad categories of exemptions from the take prohibition. Eliminates protection for endangered marine species (e.g. sea turtles, Steller sea lions, sea otters) that are incidentally taken by commercial fishing and oil and gas development out to the 200-mile limit of federal maritime jurisdiction. Sec. 403, above, shows part of the reasons why marine life activists say Sen. Slade Gorton is "A Threat to All Marine Life." Go to All Rivers Run Somewhere Termination by Appropriation Indian Territory Quick Links| Table of Contents The artwork is Thomas Moran's "Tower Falls." |